Share of one "$100M public safety investment" (NYS, Jul 2026)
0.0%
NY extraction per second
$0.00
Methodology — measured where possible, labeled where not
What this is and isn't: gross sell-side outflow, allocated geographically — the scale of the churn, not net trader losses. Footnotes [6]–[8] explain why the honest net figure is far smaller. Unlike the pump.fun clock, the baseline here is measured on-chain, not extrapolated from press coverage.
[1] First trade. The first indexed DEX trade for mint 9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump was June 16, 2026 21:05 UTC (Dune, dex_solana.trades). This coin is weeks old. (DexScreener's pair metadata suggesting an earlier date is wrong; on-chain wins.)
[2] Lifetime volume & sells — measured. As of Jul 6, 2026 12:00 UTC: 1,754,210 trades, $401.1M total volume, $236.2M sell-side (Dune query 7899148). Cross-check: an independent local trade indexer recorded ~$20.4M/day of buy+sell volume on Jul 4–5, matching the Dune lifetime average of ~$20.5M/day.
[3] Tick rate — live. The clock polls the public DexScreener API every 60s for current price, market cap, and 24h volume across all pairs, and ticks the counters at (24h volume × sell share) / 86,400 per second. If the API is unreachable it falls back to the lifetime average ($20.5M/day), and the status bar says so.
[4] Sell share — measured, not assumed. Sells are 58.9% of lifetime volume ($236.2M of $401.1M). More money has come out than gone in via DEX trades — the token is in distribution. Adjustable below.
[5] Geography — the hand-wavy part. US share 47.3% borrows SimilarWeb's pump.fun audience split (Similarweb, May 2026) as a proxy; NY = 5.85% of US by population. Caveat honestly: Ansem is an American crypto-twitter KOL, so the US share of this coin is plausibly higher than the platform average — the default is likely conservative. Adjustable.
[6] Gross sell volume isn't extraction — it's churn. A degen who round-trips $1,000 fifty times generates $25,000 of "sells" while maybe losing $300. The same SOL cycles through the casino hundreds of times. That's how a three-week-old coin posts $401M of volume on ~$3M of pooled liquidity. The clock is counting the speed of the roulette wheel, not the money leaving players' pockets.
[7] It double-counts both sides of a zero-sum game. Every dollar a winner "extracts" came from another trader — including other New Yorkers. Attributing all sells to a population by share counts that population's snipers extracting from its own retail as damage twice. Net damage to a population is (their losses − their winnings + fees they paid) — their share of the rake, not of volume.
[8] The rake is the real number, and it's far smaller. Aggregate net trader losses ≈ what leaves the table: DEX/protocol fees (~0.25–1% of volume ⇒ $1–4M here), Telegram-bot fees (~1% of bot-routed volume), validator tips, and insider/sniper net profits (real, unbounded here — for a KOL coin in distribution, plausibly the largest slice). On $401M of volume the rake is millions to low tens of millions — not $236M.
Dispute a number? Change it.
The clock recomputes live from these parameters. Defaults are the measured/sourced values above. The 24h-volume field auto-updates from DexScreener unless you edit it.